Radical right up in arms after Kansas gay sex ruling

My blog has moved!!! Please visit my new blog for all the newest news, events, opinions and more!!!
You will be automatically re-directed in three seconds. Click the link to go to the new blog now. Use the search function on the new blog to find any story you are looking for on here.

From Reuters: Battle lines drawn after Kansas gay-sex ruling Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:34 PM ET By Ros Krasny CHICAGO (Reuters) - Gay activists applauded a Kansas Supreme Court decision throwing out a measure that allowed vastly harsher punishment for older teenagers who have consensual sex with underage teens of the same gender. But conservatives cast the ruling as a victory for supporters of a creeping gay-rights agenda. "This is legislating from the bench that does not reflect the rule of the citizenry," Jerry Johnston, pastor of the First Family Church in Overland Park, Kansas, told Reuters on Saturday. The state's top court ruled 6-0 on Friday that different penalties for underage homosexual and heterosexual sex violate the U.S. Constitution's clause barring states from denying people equal protection of the laws. Matthew Limon has served more than five years of a 17-year prison sentence for criminal sodomy after performing a consensual oral sex act on a 14-year-old boy in 2000, when he was 18. Had the boy been a girl, Limon would have faced a maximum of just 15 months behind bars under a so-called "Romeo and Juliet" law that allows lighter punishment for teenagers 18 or younger who have sex with 14- and 15-year-olds of the opposite sex. It is illegal to have sex with anyone under age 16 in Kansas. 'MORAL DISAPPROVAL' A lower court had ruled that the state could justify the harsher punishment for gay sex as a way of fighting disease or strengthening traditional values. "The only reason for writing into law different penalties for different people is that some people disapprove of gay sex," said Matt Coles, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Lesbian and Gay Rights Project, which handled Limon's appeal. Kansas Justice Marla Luckert wrote in the ruling that "moral disapproval of a group cannot be a legitimate governmental interest." To read the full article CLICK HERE See earlier post: Kansas Supreme Court: Underage gay sex cannot have harsher punishment